Sunday articles

Sunday articles

Sunday is because he overturned his editor from his throne when he was on vacation. This is a round of some good documents from the Internet last week.

The list of these games wrote the words I hated by Riley Macleod in Aftermath set out some words from the game journalists will do well to avoid. I wrote a list similar than ten years ago, and it was interesting to see many examples (“role -playing”, “IP”, “Franchise”) still used by writers enough to continue complaints from professional editors like Macleod.

“A lot of video games write words around marketing words; while I don’t consider journalists as PR enemy, we are doing very different jobs and words we choose to clarify it.

(As long as we are being committed because game. But do not mind, the point of Macleod about use is sound.)

Pacific Drive feels like Storm chasing, Kaire Hultner of No Escape wrote. I like this explanation of Roguelike. My similarity will be “a really bad trip in a car injured” but a storm chase feels in the spirit of the game. (Revealed: Paul Dean, one of the writers of Pacific Drive, wrote to RPS).

Sometimes, the time runs out of time to chase storms is to drive, navigate unfamiliar dirt roads and poorly maintained road surface, constantly check your route map and GPS and Doppler radar to make sure you will not encounter anything. Honda Civic and rushed into the Oklahoma City subway area every spring and in the middle of autumn for a prank, but intelligent chasers training first. “

The writer of digital issues Gerry McGocate offers a case that the storage of our data is an increasingly wasteful, beneficial forced and realistic and disadvantage on the planet.

“We are destroying our environment to store copies of things we have no intention of looking back. We destroy our environment to take 1.9 trillion photos per year. It is many photos taken in a year in the 2020s will be taken. And exactly how big technology wants it.”

What else lives in the cloud? Yup, who it is. In bubbles, technology writers, Bryan McMahon, giving the case of AI generation is a market bubble and pointed out that one of the largest companies of technology, Openai, is burning money at an incredible speed, without the prospect of returning, while Chinese technology versions are much cheaper. Some points in this work are very familiar and clear to anyone who knows Snake Oil when they smell it, but it is great to have an instinct supported by the figures.

To start, Openai is burning money at an impressive but unstable speed. The latest sponsorship is the third time in the past two years, not typical for a startup company, also includes a 4 billion dollar credit credit, a tap loan, basically at the top of the $ 6.6 billion of equity, shows an inconsistent demand for the cash of investors to survive. Despite $ 3.7 billion in revenue this year, Openai is expected to lose $ 5 billion due to the cost of the construction of the construction and running generation AI models, including $ 4 billion in cloud computing to run their AI models, $ 3 billion to train the next models of the models and $ 1.5 billion for their employees. In its own number, Openai lost $ 2 per 1 dollar that it created, a red flag for the sustainability of any business.

Look at these poor ants. Is their endless pheromonal death a metaphor for something that we humans also experience? Maybe, but being cursed if I am the connection. It was Sunday, I didn’t work today.

Music this week is if my enemy uc by Rubblebucket. There is no enough video game for you? Okay, there is all the soundtrack south at midnight. Oh Aye. That will do.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *