Is there any graphics card that is significantly stored like GeForce XX80S? RTX 3080 is a thing of beauty, only faded by the worst destruction of Wheeler (and cryptocurrency mining) in the history of PC component. After that, the RTX 4080 shook at £ 1269 / $ 1199, a serious mistake that the RTX 4080 Super seemed good – although it was almost not faster – simply not repeated. For the new benefit of RTX 5080, you are almost want It is boring.
It is not. But after that, it was not a dialysis like RTX 4080, nor is it a large display like the RTX 5090. In particular, if you have a 4K screen to make the most of it.
It is definitely a more reasonable purchase than the RTX 5090 for a high game. A founder version, like the version I am testing here, will give you £ 979 / $ 999, or cost about half of the next (final) RTX 50 model. In addition, while it has the same 16GB VRAM 256 bits, Super 4080 and 4080, but that is enough for all the largest resources of the AAA industry and it has been upgraded to GDDR7 to get more bandwidth. Receive the founding version and you will also design your lovely metal design and the effective double cooler that RTX 5090 Fe has, running here colder thanks to the lower energy needs of RTX 4080.
It is still a thirsty, certainly: Nvidia Reckon you will need at least one PSU 850W to run it, and the maximum use is assessed at 360W. However, unlike on the RTX 5090 Fe, I did not record the RTX 5080 Fe really reached its limit, with it peaked at 322W while running games. Its GPU temperature 64 ° C is a good ripening agent compared to 5090. Reasonable. ISH.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Review: 4K benchmark
The largest and most frightening main screen resolutions do not cause discomfort to RTX 5080, even in recent difficult athletes. RTX 5090 is still faster, although RTX 5080 can always fit most of the output of siblings per second for half of cash. This is also a delicious upgrade in the upper class of RTX 30 Series – encouraging, if you are upgrading from an older card – and it is even close to the RTX 4090, at the time of writing still increases to 1300 pounds in the old market.
Fans of the Keen chart can recall that RTX 4080 has defeated RTX 3090 and RTX 3090 completely, so it is a bit of reverse disturbance for RTX 5080 to not completely far beyond the leading dog of the previous generation. I am not sure it is a particularly big deal, in addition to maintaining conventions, although I want RTX 5080 to speed up the speed of Rastered and Rez games on RTX 4080 Super.
To consider this, we have to be in time, but with the apology of its old RPS test rig and its core i5-11600k, this is the only time I have Super RTX 4080 results. Cyberpunk 2077 saw a good swelling, increasing from 51fps (with extremely installed) on the super speed 4080 to 71fps on 5080, although the latest GPU of the latest GPU in F1 22 (on Ultra 22 on ULTrA 22 (Ultra 22 on ULTrA 22 (Ultra 22 on ULTRA 22 (ULTrA 22 on ULTrA 22 (Ultra 22 on ULTRA 22 (ULTrA 22 on ULTRA 22 (ULTrA 22 on ULTRA High) is a growth of only 12fps. Metro EXODUS hardly improved, an average of 99fps on Super and 106FPS 4080 of 5080.
However, what none of these 40 series RTX tags has a full kit of Framerate DLSS 4 analysis tools. Although one of my personal favorite categories among these – options for new transformer models to upgrade, help enhance the overall image quality in exchange for a smaller efficiency increase level – To be Available for older RTX models, creating the first multi -frame (MFG) is exclusively for the Se -RTX 50. And this can really push RTX 5080 via RTX 4090, at least in terms of smoothness that can be seen.
If you are not familiar, MFG will create AI frame of DLSS 3 and can throw anywhere between one and three frames created for each frame that your PC really displays. This adds some input lag and it will not necessarily feel Smoothly (because the frames are not included in the mouse motion or pressing your keyboard), but the visual impact can really look very good. On the RTX 5080, MFG also opens the possibility of framerates on 60fps while combining 4K with some of the most demanding paths and tracking effects in the business. In all three games I tried, apply the Frame Gen 4X option, let it go through RTX 4090, with the maximum DLSS version 3 with 2X installation of MFG.
Outside the Nerdery benchmark, everything seems to be able to play, although Alan Wake II has started to push 100ms of latency with MFG 4 times – enough for the purpose of becoming slow. Perhaps I will reduce DLSS from quality to balance, in that case, to increase the facility of 37 frames no one every second. That will improve visual smoothness while touching the ability to meet. However, if not, DLSS 4 made a convincing argument in the support of RTX 5080 and with 75 compatible games confirmed, it will start being supported much more widely than rivals Frame Gen Tech like FSR 3 and Xoss 2 did.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Review: Benchmark 1440p
As always, anything 4K can do, 1440p can do faster and have good reasons to select RTX 5080 for this resolution if you have redirected all your screen upgrade budget into the GPU fund. The Bottlenecking Snips CPU of the height of the RTX 5090, allows this cheaper card to increase the speed more effectively, while narrowing the gap compared to the RTX 4090 and the design is so hard on the RTX 3090.
That said, it is worth waiting for RTX 5070 and RTX 5070 Ti at this stage. RTX 5080 is definitely a barnstorer at 1440p but unlike 4K, sometimes there is a feeling that you are paying more energy and features you can use. For example, 4 times MFG is not helpful because the frames you can get without it is very high: Take Cyberpunk 2077 with psychological traces, that RTX 5080 can run at 106fps with only quality DLSS. Most screens will not even be able to display all the additional AI frames, even if your eyes may notice the difference between those speeds – and the profit decreases effectively.
Then, again, there is a case for the frame gene twice in some games. F1 24 on Ultra High increased from 116fps with only quality DLS to 148fps with the frame gene, and that really created a remarkable smoothness improvement (if small). The RTX 5080 is obviously not a bad GPU for Quad HD – this is not the best resolution to spread its DLSS 4 wing, so why it will be attractive to see if the RTX 5070 duo is more affordable can create more suitable matches.
Or AMD’s Radeon RX 9070, maybe. That will have its own improved DLSS opponent in FSR 4, although it seems that this will be a simpler 2x frame creation in the DLSS 3 vein. With MFG faster and more flexible, the optional of the sharp transformer model of DLSS 4 and the historical advantages of the GeForce line with Ray and Path to find, it’s hard to see this GPU RDNA 4 will stand up with RTX 50 with RTX 50 50 with RTX 50 50 Series on features.
For 4K, anyway, RTX 5080 is the defeat. It is cooler, more efficient and (no, UH, counting any potential stocks) can be achieved more than RTX 5090, while still having enough muscles for maximum quality, darkness. Is it lovely like RTX 3080 being abused, the seller does not? Not too much – a larger jump from Super RTX 4080 will be appreciated. But it is a better overall agreement than the original Super and RTX 4080, especially when you start exploiting its more advanced technology. Technology can help it leave RTX 4090 behind, not to mention those 4080s.
This assessment is based on a retail unit provided by the manufacturer.
